No notices at this time.
Shakespeare's Sonnets & Famous Speeches
Sixteen SessionsA free literary course for the residents of 2601 · taught by James F. Mulhern
What would you like to see?
Click any button below.
Important Information & Course Materials▾
An Invitation▾
You don’t need to have read Shakespeare before. You don’t need to have liked him in school. You don’t need to remember anything about him at all.
What you need is a willingness to listen — to let a line of language from four centuries ago land in your ear and do something unexpected. Shakespeare wrote about desire, grief, jealousy, doubt, the fear of dying, the surprise of beauty, and the strange comfort of friendship. He wrote about all of it brilliantly, in forms short enough to hold in one hand. That’s what we’ll read.
Each week we read one sonnet and one famous speech. Fifteen minutes of text, total. The other seventy-five minutes belong to us — to the conversation, the questions, the moments of recognition.
Come as you are. Bring your curiosity. Leave everything else at the door.
Welcome▾
My name is James Mulhern. I’ve spent decades in classrooms — at universities, at Oxford, in seminar rooms with graduate students and in living rooms with retirees. And I can tell you with confidence: the most alive conversations I’ve ever had about Shakespeare have happened with people who came in nervous, who thought they “weren’t literary,” who almost didn’t show up.
Shakespeare doesn’t require credentials. He requires attention. And he rewards it in ways that keep surprising me, every single time.
This course is my invitation to you to find that out for yourself.
What This Course Is▾
This is a free, non-graded, sixteen-week reading group for adult residents of 2601. Each week we will read one Shakespeare sonnet and one famous speech or soliloquy — short, self-contained texts that stand completely on their own. You will never feel lost because you missed a previous week. Every session begins fresh.
We will:
- Read aloud in the room together, taking turns with parts and lines
- Pause on the language and actually listen to what it does
- Use plain-English summaries freely and without apology
- Talk about what moves us, confuses us, or catches us off guard
- Connect what we read to the things we already know about love, doubt, time, and loss
All texts are freely available online. Nothing to buy, nothing to print unless you want to.
What This Course Is Not▾
- Not a lecture course. I will offer context and background, but this is a conversation, not a classroom.
- Not graded. There are no quizzes, no essays, no tests, no grades. Not ever.
- Not a full-play reading course. We will not read any complete play. Every text we encounter is self-contained — a sonnet you can hold in fourteen lines, a speech you can read in three minutes.
- Not a memorization exercise. You will never be asked to memorize a single line.
- Not a decoding session. We won’t labor over every archaic word. We’ll read aloud, let the rhythm do its work, and clarify what we need to as we go.
- Not intimidating. If it starts to feel that way, say so. That is on me to fix.
A Few Promises to You▾
- I will never make you feel foolish for asking a question. Every question about Shakespeare is a good question.
- Before we read any text, I will give a plain-English summary of what it is and where it comes from. No one starts behind.
- I will pause on the famous lines. We will not rush past “To be, or not to be” as if it were a transition sentence.
- I will keep us on time. Sessions begin and end at 90 minutes.
- If you miss a week, you can return the next week without penalty or awkwardness. Each session stands alone.
A Few Asks of You▾
- Read the week’s texts before class if you can — but if you can’t, come anyway. We read everything aloud together.
- Be willing to take a turn reading a few lines when invited. No performance required. Just your voice.
- Bring your questions, especially the ones that feel too basic.
- Extend the same patience to other readers that you hope they’ll extend to you.
Course Details▾
| Texts | Shakespeare’s Sonnets + Famous Speeches and Soliloquies |
| Location | Community Room, 2601 |
| Duration | 16 weeks · 90 minutes per session |
| Cost | Free |
| Instructor | James F. Mulhern — Professor of English; former Department Chair; Writing Fellow, Exeter College, University of Oxford |
| Format | Discussion + read-aloud; no grades |
| Readings | All public domain; free online links provided below |
What to Expect Each Week▾
Each 90-minute session follows a consistent, unhurried structure:
- 0:00–0:10 — Welcome; brief recap of last week (or, for newcomers, a one-sentence orient)
- 0:10–0:20 — Plain-English introduction to the week’s sonnet and speech: where each comes from, who speaks, what situation prompted it
- 0:20–0:50 — Read-aloud: the sonnet first (usually read twice — once by one voice, once shared), then the speech with assigned parts; pause often
- 0:50–1:15 — Guided discussion using the week’s questions; the conversation goes where it wants
- 1:15–1:25 — Closing reflection; optional writing prompt shared aloud; preview of next week
- 1:25–1:30 — Informal conversation; no one has to leave
Schedule at a Glance▾
| Session | Theme | Sonnet | Speech |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Welcome & How to Hear Shakespeare | Sonnet 18 | Jaques, “All the world’s a stage” (As You Like It 2.7) |
| 2 | Love at First Sight | Sonnet 116 | Romeo, balcony speech (Romeo and Juliet 2.2) |
| 3 | Time & Mortality | Sonnet 73 | Macbeth, “Tomorrow, and tomorrow” (Macbeth 5.5) |
| 4 | Beauty & the Body | Sonnet 130 | Cleopatra, “Give me my robe” (Antony & Cleopatra 5.2) |
| 5 | Doubt & Conscience | Sonnet 29 | Hamlet, “To be, or not to be” (Hamlet 3.1) |
| 6 | The Dark Side of Love | Sonnet 147 | Othello, “It is the cause” (Othello 5.2) |
| 7 | Friendship & Fidelity | Sonnet 30 | Henry V, St. Crispin’s Day (Henry V 4.3) |
| 8 | Jealousy | Sonnet 57 | Iago, “I am not what I am” (Othello 1.1 + 3.3) |
| 9 | The Aging Speaker | Sonnet 60 | Lear, “Blow, winds” (King Lear 3.2) |
| 10 | Ambition | Sonnet 94 | Lady Macbeth, “Come, you spirits” (Macbeth 1.5) |
| 11 | The Power of Imagination | Sonnet 27 | Theseus, “The lunatic, the lover, and the poet” (MND 5.1) |
| 12 | Mercy & Justice | Sonnet 121 | Portia, “The quality of mercy” (Merchant of Venice 4.1) |
| 13 | Memory & Loss | Sonnet 71 | Constance, “Grief fills the room” (King John 3.4) |
| 14 | Self-Knowledge | Sonnet 62 | Hamlet, “What a piece of work is a man” (Hamlet 2.2) |
| 15 | Letting Go | Sonnet 87 | Prospero, “Our revels now are ended” (The Tempest 4.1) |
| 16 | Capstone — Favorite Passages | Your choice | Closing: Sonnet 18 together |
Literary Terms Glossary▾
You will never be tested on these. They are here as a reference — useful shorthand when we want to name what Shakespeare is doing on the page.
Sonnet — A fourteen-line poem, almost always in iambic pentameter. Shakespeare wrote 154 of them. The English (or Shakespearean) sonnet divides into three quatrains and a closing couplet: ABAB CDCD EFEF GG. The argument usually builds through the quatrains and pivots or resolves at the couplet.
Quatrain — A four-line unit of poetry. In a Shakespearean sonnet, each of the three quatrains typically develops one aspect of the poem’s argument. Tracking the three quatrains is the simplest way to follow the logic of a sonnet.
Volta — The Italian word for “turn.” The pivot point in a sonnet where the argument shifts direction — often a surprise, a reversal, or a deepening. In a Shakespearean sonnet it usually arrives at line 9 (the beginning of the third quatrain) or line 13 (the closing couplet). When you notice something changing in a sonnet, that’s the volta.
Couplet — Two consecutive rhyming lines. In a Shakespearean sonnet, the final two lines form a couplet that often delivers the poem’s conclusion, paradox, or twist. Some couplets feel like neat resolutions; others feel deliberately unsatisfying — which is itself an artistic choice.
Iambic pentameter — A line of ten syllables following a weak-STRONG rhythm (da-DUM, da-DUM, da-DUM, da-DUM, da-DUM). It’s the rhythm of a heartbeat, and also the natural rhythm of spoken English — which is part of why it feels both formal and human when read aloud. Shakespeare breaks the meter regularly for effect; a line that doesn’t fit usually means something.
Blank verse — Unrhymed iambic pentameter. The standard form for the speeches and soliloquies in Shakespeare’s plays. It has the structure of poetry without the insistence of rhyme, which allows it to feel more like elevated speech than song.
Soliloquy — A speech delivered alone on stage, directly to the audience. The character is thinking in public — sharing their true inner state, uncensored by social obligation. “To be, or not to be,” “Tomorrow, and tomorrow, and tomorrow,” and “Come, you spirits” are all soliloquies. They are Shakespeare’s way of granting access to a character’s interior life.
Aside — A brief remark spoken to the audience that other characters on stage cannot hear (by theatrical convention). Unlike a soliloquy, an aside happens in the middle of a scene — a private disclosure while the social action continues around it. Iago’s asides are among the most disturbing in Shakespeare; he tells us exactly what he is doing.
Dramatic irony — When the audience knows something that a character on stage does not. It generates dread, pity, or dark comedy depending on context. When Othello declares his trust in Iago while the audience already knows Iago is manipulating him, every word of trust becomes painful.
Foil — A character whose qualities contrast with another’s, making each one’s characteristics more visible. Hamlet and Horatio are foils — one consumed by doubt, the other steadily rational. Romeo and Benvolio are foils in matters of love. The contrast sharpens what we see in each.
Pun / Wordplay — Shakespeare’s texts are dense with puns, many invisible without a footnote. He often uses puns at moments of highest tension — comedy and tragedy occupying the same word at the same moment. In the speeches we read, a phrase that seems to carry a second meaning almost always does; the pleasure is in noticing it.
Prose vs. verse in Shakespeare — Shakespeare’s noble and educated characters generally speak in verse (iambic pentameter); common people and comic characters often speak in prose. But the switch is deliberate: when a high-status character drops into prose, it signals intimacy, disorder, or psychological unraveling. Lady Macbeth’s sleepwalking speech — the most desperate moment of her arc — is in prose. Hamlet speaks prose to Rosencrantz and Guildenstern, whom he does not trust.
Reading Companion: How to Hear Shakespeare's Lines▾
An essay by James F. Mulhern
The most common complaint I hear from first-time Shakespeare readers is some version of this: “I can’t understand what he’s saying.” And I always give the same answer: you’re reading it wrong. Not because you aren’t smart enough — but because Shakespeare’s language was never meant to be read silently. It was written for the ear. It was written to be heard.
Here is the single most useful instruction I can give you: read the lines aloud, even before you understand them. Read them again. By the third time, you will understand more than you expected. The rhythm carries the meaning. The meter is a form of punctuation that tells you where to lean, where to pause, where to let the breath go.
Shakespeare writes in iambic pentameter — a line of ten syllables, five beats, following a weak-STRONG pattern: da-DUM, da-DUM, da-DUM, da-DUM, da-DUM. It is the rhythm of a resting heartbeat. It is also — and this is the remarkable thing — the natural rhythm of spoken English. Which is why, when you hear a trained actor speak Shakespeare well, it sounds neither stilted nor sing-songy. It sounds like something between speech and music — like heightened conversation.
When you encounter a word you don’t know, keep going. Don’t stop to look it up mid-read. Follow the rhythm and the syntax, the way you would in any unfamiliar language. The surrounding words will often carry you. Shakespeare’s vocabulary is large but not alien. Words that look archaic — wherefore, hath, dost, thee, thy — follow rules as regular as anything you already know. Thee and thou are simply the intimate second-person singular, the way the French use tu rather than vous. Once you understand that, an enormous amount of the supposed foreignness dissolves.
There are common misreadings worth knowing. Wherefore art thou Romeo? does not mean Where are you, Romeo? — an error so widespread it has become its own cultural joke. Wherefore means why. Juliet is asking why Romeo has to be a Montague — the very family her family despises. The entire tragedy turns on that question. One archaic word unlocks one of the most important lines in Shakespeare. This is what happens, again and again, when you get past the surface.
Let punctuation guide you, not line breaks. A line that ends mid-sentence is not a pause. Follow the sentence to its period or semicolon exactly as you would in prose — the thought continues until the grammar completes. Many people pause after every line of verse and lose the meaning entirely. Let the argument finish itself.
Pay attention to when the meter breaks. Shakespeare uses iambic pentameter as a baseline and departs from it deliberately — for grief, emphasis, violence, irony. A line with nine syllables often has a weighted silence at the end. A line that runs long often means the speaker is losing control of their own speech. When you notice the rhythm faltering, something is happening.
Trust the famous speeches. The texts we call famous — “To be, or not to be,” “Shall I compare thee to a summer’s day,” “Our revels now are ended” — are famous because they are genuinely extraordinary, not because of inertia. Reading them in the context we build together across this course, knowing something of the speaker and the moment, makes them different than they are on a motivational calendar. Better. Stranger. More unsettling.
Don’t resist emotion. You may not be able to explain precisely what “We are such stuff as dreams are made on, and our little life is rounded with a sleep” means — not yet, not in full. But if you read it aloud, in a room with other people, you will feel it. The texture of those words does something. That feeling is not a lesser response than analysis; it is the beginning of understanding. Start there. The analysis will follow.
Shakespeare has been read for four hundred years because human beings keep finding themselves in his pages. They recognize their own jealousy in Othello, their own ambition in Macbeth, their own grief in Constance, their own exhaustion with life’s meaninglessness in Hamlet. None of those recognitions require a literature degree. They require only the willingness to sit with the language, to read it aloud, and to notice what it does to you. That is what we do here, together, week after week. And it is enough.
About Me▾
I am a Professor of English who has taught literature, writing, and Shakespeare at the university level for more than thirty years. I served as Department Chair and was a Writing Fellow at Oxford. I have led seminars for graduate students, senior scholars, corporate executives, and first-time readers in every context imaginable.
But what I care about more than any of those credentials is the moment — the specific, unmistakable moment — when someone who came in nervous encounters a line of Shakespeare and finds it true. Finds it immediate. Finds it about their own life. That moment happens every time I teach Shakespeare to a first-time reader. Every time, without exception. After thirty years, it still surprises me.
This course is for you — whether you live in this building and have always meant to read Shakespeare and never quite got there; whether you read him in school and found him cold; whether you’ve never opened a page; whether you loved him once and want that feeling back. You are exactly the right person for this course. There is no more qualified reader.
I look forward to reading with you.
All course readings are freely available online through public-domain sources. The Poetry Foundation, MIT Shakespeare, and Folger Digital Texts are all free to access without login or subscription.
This course is offered free of charge to residents of 2601, Philadelphia. No registration required beyond showing up.
The Sessions▾
Session 1 — Welcome & How to Hear Shakespeare
Main Points of the Lesson
- The sonnet is an argument in fourteen lines. The English (Shakespearean) sonnet is a single stanza of fourteen lines in iambic pentameter, built as three quatrains plus a closing couplet rhyming ABAB CDCD EFEF GG. Each quatrain typically develops one stage of a thought, and the couplet sums it up or springs a surprise. Sonnet 18 is the cleanest model of that machinery in the whole sequence.
- Shakespeare wrote for the ear, not the eye. His language was made to be spoken aloud and heard, which is why reading it silently can feel forbidding. If you read a line aloud — even before you fully understand it — the rhythm carries the meaning toward you. This is the single most useful habit the course will build.
- Iambic pentameter is the heartbeat under the line. Ten syllables in a weak-STRONG pattern (da-DUM, five times) mirror both a resting pulse and the natural cadence of spoken English. That is why good Shakespeare sounds like heightened conversation rather than sing-song, and why a broken or short line almost always signals something happening in the speaker.
- Sonnet 18 wagers that a poem can defeat time. Its rhetorical move is to reject the comparison it proposes — a summer’s day is too short, too rough, too changeable — and then claim the beloved’s “eternal summer” survives in the poem itself: “this gives life to thee.” The thematic stake is enormous: art as a stay against mortality.
- Jaques turns a life into a play in seven acts. “All the world’s a stage” is a set-piece speech in blank verse (unrhymed iambic pentameter) that frames human life as a scripted performance running from “the infant, / Mewling and puking” to “second childishness and mere oblivion.” Its rhetorical engine is relentless cataloguing, and its stake is whether the metaphor clarifies a life or flattens it.
- The sonnet and the speech are opposite answers to time. Sonnet 18 seeks permanence against time’s decay; Jaques narrates time’s unstoppable forward march toward oblivion. Reading them together stages the course’s central tension between what endures and what passes.
Reading
- Sonnet 18 — “Shall I compare thee to a summer’s day?” · Poetry Foundation · Folger Digital Texts
- Jaques, “All the world’s a stage” — As You Like It 2.7 · MIT Shakespeare · Folger Digital Texts
Critical Reception
- About Shakespeare’s Sonnets — Folger Shakespeare Library — the Folger editors’ free introduction to the sequence’s form, themes, and history.
- Shakespeare’s Sonnets — Royal Shakespeare Company — the RSC’s free overview of sonnet form, with a paraphrase of Sonnet 18 as one of the great “chat-up” poems about poetry’s power to immortalize.
- William Shakespeare (poet overview) — Poetry Foundation — scholarly biography situating the sonnets and plays across Shakespeare’s career.
In-Class Practice
Read Sonnet 18 twice — once by the instructor, once passed line by line around the room. Then read the Jaques speech with one strong voice. Spend five minutes naming, out loud, the single word in each text that landed hardest, and why.
Discussion Questions
- In Sonnet 18, the speaker says the poem itself will keep the beloved alive. Do you find that persuasive? Can a piece of writing actually do that?
- The word “temperate” in line 2 means mild and moderate — not too hot, not too cold. What is Shakespeare saying about the beloved by calling them more temperate than a summer day?
- Jaques’s “seven ages of man” describes life as a performance with a script. Does that metaphor feel true to you — or does it leave something out?
- Both texts are meditations on time. What is each one saying about how time moves, and what survives it?
- On a first read, what was the single word or phrase that stopped you — that made you want to pause? Why that one?
- Is there a difference between reading a poem silently and hearing it read aloud? What changed for you in this session?
Homework
Write one sentence — just one — completing this: “When I read Shakespeare, I feel…” Save it; we will return to it in Session 16. Then read next week’s two texts aloud once before class.
Session 2 — Love at First Sight
Main Points of the Lesson
- Sonnet 116 defines love by negation. Its whole rhetorical strategy is to say what love is not — “not love / Which alters when it alteration finds.” By ruling out everything fickle, the poem builds an ideal of constancy through exclusion rather than description.
- Love becomes a fixed point for the lost. The sonnet’s central image, “the star to every wand’ring bark,” makes love the navigational constant by which the wandering ship steers. The thematic stake is that love’s value lies in steadiness, not intensity.
- Love is set explicitly against time. “Love’s not Time’s fool, though rosy lips and cheeks / Within his bending sickle’s compass come” insists true love survives the decay of beauty. The closing couplet stakes everything on this claim — “if this be error… I never writ.”
- Romeo’s balcony speech is rapture caught in the moment. This is blank verse spoken as overheard soliloquy, escalating through images — Juliet as the sun, as stars, as an angel. Its rhetorical engine is hyperbole piling on hyperbole, dramatizing infatuation that arrives without warning.
- The speech is overheard, not addressed. Romeo speaks before Juliet knows he is there, which complicates the romance: he adores an image of her, not yet a person in dialogue. That gap raises the session’s quiet question about the difference between adoring someone and being in relationship with them.
- Both texts reach for the cosmos. Sonnet and speech alike turn to stars, light, and navigation, suggesting Shakespeare treats love as a force that reorders the universe around the beloved — though one text is calm and definitional, the other breathless and particular.
Reading
- Sonnet 116 — “Let me not to the marriage of true minds” · Poetry Foundation · Folger Digital Texts
- Romeo, balcony speech — Romeo and Juliet 2.2 · MIT Shakespeare · Folger Digital Texts
Critical Reception
- Shakespeare’s Sonnets — Royal Shakespeare Company — free RSC overview that paraphrases Sonnet 116’s claim that “true minds in love know that love never changes but lasts forever.”
- Romeo and Juliet — About the Play — Royal Shakespeare Company — free guide to the play’s key moments, including the famous balcony scene and Shakespeare’s use of the sonnet form within it.
- Learning the Sonnet — Poetry Foundation — free article on how the sonnet form shapes (and subverts) love poetry.
In-Class Practice
Read Sonnet 116 in full together. Assign Romeo’s speech to one reader and pause after each image. For five minutes, try replacing one of Romeo’s celestial comparisons with a non-celestial one aloud, and discuss what is gained or lost.
Discussion Questions
- Sonnet 116 defines love by what it is not — it’s not something that changes, bends, or fades. Is that a realistic definition of love, or an ideal one?
- Romeo compares Juliet to the sun, the stars, an angel. Does that kind of hyperbole feel authentic to you, or does it feel like performance?
- Romeo is watching Juliet without her knowledge. Does the beauty of the speech change if we think about that?
- Both texts describe love as something almost astronomical — stars, navigation, light. What does it suggest that Shakespeare keeps reaching for celestial imagery when writing about love?
- Have you ever felt the kind of love Sonnet 116 describes — the kind that doesn’t alter? Is it possible, or is it an aspiration?
- If you had to choose, is the steadier love the one in the sonnet or the one in the speech — and what does your choice say about what you think love is?
Homework
Write two or three sentences describing love using a comparison that has nothing to do with stars, light, or weather. Find a fresh metaphor, and bring it to share.
Session 3 — Time & Mortality
Main Points of the Lesson
- Sonnet 73 builds through three shrinking images of fading. Its three quatrains move from autumn boughs (“yellow leaves, or none, or few”) to fading twilight to a dying fire — season, then day, then hour. Each contraction of the time-frame intensifies the felt nearness of an ending, a textbook use of the sonnet’s quatrain structure to stage a deepening argument.
- The couplet turns mortality into a reason for love. “This thou perceiv’st, which makes thy love more strong, / To love that well which thou must leave ere long” claims that knowing something will end can deepen our devotion to it. The stake is consoling but unproven, and the session tests whether we believe it.
- Macbeth’s “Tomorrow” speech is Shakespeare at his most nihilistic. This blank-verse soliloquy makes time itself a meaningless crawl — days “creep” in a “petty pace” — and reduces life to a “brief candle,” “a walking shadow,” a tale “told by an idiot… signifying nothing.” Its rhetorical move is relentless deflation, image after image draining meaning away.
- Context reframes the speech entirely. Macbeth speaks just after learning his wife has died, so the question is whether we hear genuine grief, exhaustion, or a murderer’s self-justification dressed as cosmic despair.
- Two endings, two emotional temperatures. The sonnet meets mortality with tenderness and resignation; the speech meets it with hollow fury. Reading them together shows the same fact — everything ends — answered in opposite emotional weather.
- Meter carries the meaning in both. Each text uses the weight and breaks of iambic pentameter to slow time down or let it run out, rewarding close attention to exactly where the rhythm falters.
Reading
- Sonnet 73 — “That time of year thou mayst in me behold” · Poetry Foundation · Folger Digital Texts
- Macbeth, “Tomorrow, and tomorrow, and tomorrow” — Macbeth 5.5 · MIT Shakespeare · Folger Digital Texts
Critical Reception
- Shakespeare’s Sonnets — Royal Shakespeare Company — free RSC overview that reads Sonnet 73 as the poet in “the winter and sunset” of life, with decay only strengthening the beloved’s love.
- Macbeth: “tomorrow, and tomorrow and tomorrow” (5.5.16–27) — University of Cambridge, Faculty of English — a free scholarly close-reading of the soliloquy from Cambridge’s “Slow Shakespeare” project.
- Macbeth — Folger Shakespeare Library — free scholarly edition with synopsis and context for the Act 5 soliloquy.
In-Class Practice
Read Sonnet 73 twice, slowly. Read the Macbeth speech first silently, then aloud by one voice. For five minutes, have the group mark where each text’s rhythm slows or stalls, and read those lines again to feel the effect.
Discussion Questions
- Sonnet 73 moves through three images of fading — autumn, twilight, dying embers. What does each add? Why three instead of one?
- The sonnet ends by saying that knowing something will end makes us love it more. Do you believe that?
- Macbeth speaks his “tomorrow” speech after learning his wife has died. How does knowing that context change the speech — does it feel like grief, or something darker?
- “Signifying nothing” — is Macbeth right? Is he speaking a truth, or is this a man who has destroyed everything around him trying to justify it?
- Both texts deal with endings. One is resigned and tender; one is hollow and furious. What accounts for the difference?
- Which of these texts landed harder for you — and why?
Homework
Write three sentences about something you know won’t last — a season, a relationship, a phase of life — and what you feel about that.
Session 4 — Beauty & the Body
Main Points of the Lesson
- Sonnet 130 refuses to flatter. For twelve lines it systematically lists what the mistress is not — not sun-eyed, not coral-lipped, not perfumed, not musical — using the sonnet’s quatrains to deflate every conventional comparison in the love-poetry handbook.
- The poem is a parody of overblown praise. Its real target is the cliché of impossible comparison itself; by mocking the blazon (the head-to-toe catalogue of a woman’s perfections), Shakespeare clears space for something honest. As the RSC notes, the false comparisons of love poetry turn out to be unnecessary to real desire.
- The couplet’s turn redeems everything. “And yet, by heaven, I think my love as rare / As any she belied with false compare” reveals the whole catalogue of “faults” as a defense of a real, particular love. The rhetorical move is to praise by refusing to praise falsely.
- Cleopatra chooses the manner of her own death. “Give me my robe, put on my crown; I have / Immortal longings in me” turns suicide into a coronation. This blank-verse speech lets her author her own ending rather than be paraded as Rome’s trophy.
- She redefines herself as element, not flesh. “I am fire and air; my other elements / I give to baser life” sheds the body Rome would diminish, asserting a selfhood and dignity beyond physical capture. The stake is sovereignty over one’s own meaning.
- Both speakers reject borrowed standards. Sonnet and speech alike refuse conventional, idealized praise — one by mocking it, one by transcending it — insisting that the truth of a person matters more than any inherited image of beauty.
Reading
- Sonnet 130 — “My mistress’ eyes are nothing like the sun” · Poetry Foundation · Folger Digital Texts
- Cleopatra, “Give me my robe, put on my crown” — Antony and Cleopatra 5.2 · MIT Shakespeare · Folger Digital Texts
Critical Reception
- Learning the Sonnet — Poetry Foundation — free article reading Sonnet 130 as a deliberate send-up of poems that compare women to the sun, roses, and music.
- Shakespeare’s Sonnets — Royal Shakespeare Company — free RSC overview noting that Sonnet 130 shows the “traditional forms of beauty… are unnecessary to provoke desire.”
- Article — About Cleopatra — Royal Shakespeare Company — free RSC essay on Cleopatra’s “infinite variety,” and how Shakespeare synthesized Plutarch’s contradictory portraits into one entrancing queen.
In-Class Practice
Read Sonnet 130 with three different readers in a row and notice how the tone shifts. Read Cleopatra’s speech from “Give me my robe” through “unparalleled” with one strong voice. Spend five minutes listing, aloud, the conventional compliments the sonnet rejects.
Discussion Questions
- Sonnet 130 spends twelve lines saying what the beloved is not — not like roses, not like perfume, not musical. Does this feel like an insult or the most honest compliment in the language?
- The sonnet is partly a parody of overblown love poetry that compares women to impossible ideals. Who do you think the real target of the joke is?
- Cleopatra is one of the most powerful women in history, and in her final speech she describes death as a lover and a sleep. What does she achieve by dying on her own terms?
- Both texts refuse conventional praise. What does that refusal say about each speaker’s relationship to truth?
- We are surrounded today by images of idealized beauty. Does Sonnet 130 say anything useful to that conversation?
- Is there a kind of power in refusing to be flattered — or in refusing to flatter? Which speaker holds it more?
Homework
Describe a person you find beautiful without using a single conventional compliment. No eyes like stars, no skin like milk. Find the real thing, and bring a few sentences.
Session 5 — Doubt & Conscience
Main Points of the Lesson
- Sonnet 29 stages a rescue by thought. The first eight lines sink into self-pity — “in disgrace with fortune and men’s eyes,” envying others their hope, friends, and skill. The sonnet uses its octave to dig the pit it will later climb out of.
- The volta turns despair into wealth. At the pivot in line 9, simply remembering “thy sweet love” brings “such wealth” that the speaker “scorn[s] to change my state with kings.” This is the sonnet’s defining rhetorical engine — a hinge on which the whole emotional weather reverses.
- “To be, or not to be” weighs existence itself. Hamlet’s blank-verse soliloquy frames the choice between enduring “the thousand natural shocks” of life and ending them, generalizing his private anguish into the universal human question. As Britannica notes, it fixes on the play’s central moral problem.
- Fear of the unknown paralyzes action. “Conscience does make cowards of us all” identifies dread of “the undiscovered country” beyond death as the force that keeps Hamlet — and humans generally — from acting. The thematic stake is whether thought itself disables us.
- One text turns; the other refuses to. The sonnet pivots cleanly to relief at line 9; Hamlet’s speech circles without resolution, mirroring a mind that cannot find its own exit. The contrast in structure is the contrast in fate.
- Both dramatize a mind at war with itself. Each speaker is trapped inside thought — one escapes through love, the other only deepens the impasse — making the session a study in how the same predicament can free or imprison.
Reading
- Sonnet 29 — “When in disgrace with fortune and men’s eyes” · Poetry Foundation · Folger Digital Texts
- Hamlet, “To be, or not to be” — Hamlet 3.1 · MIT Shakespeare · Folger Digital Texts
Critical Reception
- To be, or not to be (speech from Hamlet) — Encyclopaedia Britannica — free entry explaining the soliloquy’s place in the play’s central moral question.
- Hamlet — About the Play — Royal Shakespeare Company — free RSC overview framing the soliloquies as taking the audience “deep into the mind of Shakespeare’s most famous protagonist.”
- Shakespeare’s Sonnets — Royal Shakespeare Company — free overview paraphrasing Sonnet 29’s turn, where thinking of the beloved transports the poet so that “your love compensates for everything.”
In-Class Practice
Read Sonnet 29 passed line by line. Read “To be, or not to be” first in unison (the whole group, slowly), then by one reader. For five minutes, have the group mark exactly where the sonnet “turns” and discuss why Hamlet’s speech never does.
Discussion Questions
- In Sonnet 29, the speaker goes from despair to joy in fourteen lines, simply by thinking of someone he loves. Have you ever experienced that kind of rescue by a thought?
- “To be, or not to be” is about whether it is better to endure life’s suffering or to end it. Why do you think this question has stayed central to human experience for four centuries?
- Hamlet says conscience makes cowards of us all — that the fear of what comes after death keeps us from acting. Do you agree?
- The sonnet turns on a volta — a pivot in line 9 where everything changes. The Hamlet speech has no such turn. What does that difference say about each speaker’s situation?
- Both texts describe a mind at war with itself. What is each speaker afraid of, at the deepest level?
- Is Hamlet asking a philosophical question, or a personal one? Does it matter?
Homework
Write a few sentences about a time when you talked yourself out of despair — or into action — purely through thought, without anything in your circumstances changing.
Session 6 — The Dark Side of Love
Main Points of the Lesson
- Sonnet 147 diagnoses love as illness. “My love is as a fever, longing still / For that which longer nurseth the disease” makes desire a sickness that knowingly feeds on what makes it worse. The governing metaphor — love as fever, reason as the doctor who has given up — runs through every quatrain.
- Self-knowledge brings no cure. The speaker understands precisely what is wrong and still cannot stop, ending in a “shivering final couplet” of bitter clarity: the beloved is “as black as hell, as dark as night.” The stake is the horror of seeing one’s own compulsion clearly and remaining powerless before it.
- Othello’s “It is the cause” rationalizes murder. This blank-verse soliloquy recasts the killing of Desdemona as a solemn duty owed to “you chaste stars,” cloaking jealousy in the vocabulary of justice and sacrifice. The rhetorical move is self-deception elevated to ritual.
- Repetition does the deadly work. “Put out the light, and then put out the light” uses identical words twice, the second “light” shifting from the lamp to Desdemona’s life. Shakespeare lets the language itself enact the irreversible step Othello is talking himself into taking.
- Love curdles into possession in both texts. Sonnet and speech each trace the precise tipping point at which devotion becomes a force that destroys its object, asking when love stops protecting and starts consuming.
- The speaker’s tenderness is the horror. Othello’s gentleness toward the sleeping Desdemona — kissing her, hesitating — makes the speech more disturbing, not less: affection placed entirely in the service of destruction.
Reading
- Sonnet 147 — “My love is as a fever, longing still” · Poetry Foundation · Folger Digital Texts
- Othello, “It is the cause, it is the cause, my soul” — Othello 5.2 · MIT Shakespeare · Folger Digital Texts
Critical Reception
- Shakespeare’s Sonnets — Royal Shakespeare Company — free RSC overview describing Sonnet 147 as a “mania” in which “Love is a disease” and the poet “has been abandoned by reason.”
- Othello — About the Play — Royal Shakespeare Company — free RSC overview of how Othello’s love is turned, by manipulation, “to the destruction of everything he holds dear.”
- Othello — Folger Shakespeare Library — free scholarly edition with synopsis and context for the murder scene.
In-Class Practice
Read Sonnet 147 passed line by line. Read Othello’s speech from the opening through “she must die” with a single reader, then discuss before finishing. Spend five minutes tracing aloud the words Othello uses to make murder sound like duty.
Discussion Questions
- The speaker of Sonnet 147 knows his love is a disease and cannot stop it anyway. What does that combination of self-knowledge and helplessness feel like from inside the poem?
- Othello’s speech is one of the most troubling in Shakespeare — a man convincing himself that killing the woman he loves is a form of justice. What does he use to justify it?
- “Put out the light, and then put out the light.” It’s the same words twice, but the second “light” means something different. What is Shakespeare doing with that repetition?
- Both texts show love transformed into something that destroys. What is the tipping point — when does love become dangerous?
- Is Othello’s speech an expression of love, or the absence of it? Argue both sides.
- Does naming a feeling a “disease,” as Sonnet 147 does, give the speaker any power over it — or none at all?
Homework
Write a paragraph about the difference between loving someone and possessing them.
Session 7 — Friendship & Fidelity
Main Points of the Lesson
- Sonnet 30 puts memory on trial. Its diction is borrowed from the courtroom — “sessions,” “summon,” “cancell’d,” “account” — framing remembrance as a legal proceeding in which old griefs are re-litigated and old debts re-totalled. The conceit runs the length of the poem.
- A single friend balances the entire ledger. The couplet resolves the accumulated sorrow at a stroke: “if the while I think on thee, dear friend, / All losses are restored and sorrows end.” The rhetorical move is the sonnet’s classic turn — twelve lines of grief overturned in two.
- Henry V reframes fear as future glory. The St. Crispin’s Day speech is a blank-verse battlefield oration that turns an outnumbered army’s disadvantage into a story its survivors will be proud to have lived: those at home “shall think themselves accurs’d they were not here.”
- “Band of brothers” forges identity through shared danger. Henry promises that bleeding together dissolves rank — “he today that sheds his blood with me / Shall be my brother, be he ne’er so vile.” The thematic stake is solidarity manufactured in the face of death.
- “Happy few” reframes suffering as privilege. The startling word “happy” recasts being present at mortal peril as the very thing others will envy. The speech’s engine is this inversion of hardship into honor.
- Both texts lean on others to survive loss. A remembered friend and a band of brothers each sustain the speaker — but the sonnet asks for private consolation while the speech demands collective courage, two different things we ask of the people beside us.
Reading
- Sonnet 30 — “When to the sessions of sweet silent thought” · Poetry Foundation · Folger Digital Texts
- Henry V, St. Crispin’s Day speech — Henry V 4.3 · MIT Shakespeare · Folger Digital Texts
Critical Reception
- Shakespeare’s Sonnets — Royal Shakespeare Company — free RSC overview paraphrasing Sonnet 30: in solitude the poet grieves the past “until he thinks consolingly of you,” and his “sense of loss and grief end.”
- Henry V — About the Play — Royal Shakespeare Company — free RSC overview with context for Agincourt and the St. Crispin’s Day speech, in which Henry promises “all who fight will be remembered.”
- Henry V — Folger Shakespeare Library — free scholarly edition with synopsis and full text of the speech in context.
In-Class Practice
Read Sonnet 30 line by line around the room. Read the St. Crispin’s Day speech as a whole, then, for five minutes, have the group read it together in unison and notice how collective voicing changes its effect.
Discussion Questions
- Sonnet 30 uses legal language — “sessions,” “summon,” “cancell’d,” “account” — to describe memory. What does it mean to put memory on trial?
- The sonnet ends: a single friend erases all griefs. Is that sentimental, or does it ring true to your experience?
- Henry’s speech before an outnumbered battle turns fear into pride — it reframes disadvantage as a future story to tell. Is that manipulation, or genuine leadership?
- “We few, we happy few, we band of brothers” — the word “happy” is surprising here. Why happy? What is Henry saying about hardship?
- Both texts suggest that other people — a friend, a band of brothers — can sustain us through loss. What is the difference in what each speaker is asking for?
- Is the comfort of one remembered friend stronger or weaker than the comfort of a whole community? What does each cost?
Homework
Write about a person in your life whose memory, when you call it up, restores you. You don’t have to share the name.
Session 8 — Jealousy
Main Points of the Lesson
- Sonnet 57 dramatizes self-erasure. The speaker calls himself a “slave” whose only task is to “tend / Upon the hours and times of your desire” — waiting by the clock, daring not to question the beloved’s absences. The sonnet’s bitter irony deepens with each quatrain of professed devotion.
- Devotion shades into the loss of self. “Whilst I, my sovereign, watch the clock for you” shows love so total it has dissolved the lover’s own will and judgment; as the RSC paraphrases, “my love for you will excuse anything you do.” The stake is whether this is love at all, or its disappearance.
- Iago is defined by contradiction. “I am not what I am” announces a man whose surface and substance are deliberate opposites — the engine of the entire tragedy’s deceit. It is one of Shakespeare’s most chilling self-disclosures, spoken straight to the audience.
- He names the very weapon he wields. Iago coins “the green-eyed monster” while deliberately breeding jealousy in Othello, warning his victim against the poison he is himself pouring. The rhetorical horror is in the openness of the manipulation.
- The language of care conceals the attack. “O, beware, my lord, of jealousy” uses the grammar of concern as a delivery system for suspicion — solicitude weaponized. Iago’s asides let us watch him do it in real time.
- Two jealousies, passive and active. The sonnet shows jealousy suffered from inside; the Iago speeches show jealousy manufactured from outside — and the manufactured kind proves by far the more dangerous, because it is engineered rather than merely felt.
Reading
- Sonnet 57 — “Being your slave, what should I do but tend” · Poetry Foundation · Folger Digital Texts
- Iago, “I am not what I am” — Othello 1.1; and “I’ll pour this pestilence into his ear” — Othello 3.3 · MIT Shakespeare · Folger Digital Texts
Critical Reception
- Othello (Shakespeare Learning Zone) — Royal Shakespeare Company — free RSC resource with leveled breakdowns of character, language, and the play’s themes of jealousy and manipulation.
- Shakespeare’s Sonnets — Royal Shakespeare Company — free overview paraphrasing Sonnet 57: “I am entirely subservient to you… but I am aware that you may be fooling around.”
- Othello — Folger Shakespeare Library — free scholarly edition with context for Iago’s asides and the “green-eyed monster” scene.
In-Class Practice
Read Sonnet 57 by one reader, slowly. Read Iago’s speeches from 1.1 and 3.3 as a small sequence, assigning a narrator for context between them. For five minutes, have readers deliver Iago’s “beware” lines as if genuinely concerned, then as a predator, and compare.
Discussion Questions
- The speaker of Sonnet 57 describes himself as a “slave” to another person — waiting by the clock, making excuses, feeling nothing. Is this love or a loss of self?
- “I am not what I am” is Iago’s defining statement. What does he mean? Can a person really be the opposite of their own appearance?
- Iago coins the phrase “the green-eyed monster” — and then uses it on the person he is making jealous. What does it mean to name the weapon you’re deploying?
- Are there two different kinds of jealousy in today’s texts — passive and active? Which is more dangerous?
- Have you encountered someone who, like Iago, used the language of concern (“beware”) to plant anxiety rather than prevent it?
- Does the speaker of Sonnet 57 have anything in common with Othello — and if so, what makes them both vulnerable?
Homework
Write a few sentences in Iago’s voice — someone explaining their behavior in a way that makes it sound reasonable. Then write a sentence calling out what’s actually happening.
Session 9 — The Aging Speaker
Main Points of the Lesson
- Sonnet 60 makes time visible as motion. “Like as the waves make towards the pebbled shore, / So do our minutes hasten to their end” opens with a simile both soothing and relentless — the rhythm of the surf standing in for the rhythm of mortality.
- Time is figured as an active destroyer. It “doth transfix the flourish set on youth / And delves the parallels in beauty’s brow,” carving age into the face like a sculptor working in reverse. As the RSC notes, the poem is finally “a meditation on the power of poetry to transcend time,” with verse offered as the only counterforce.
- Lear rages at an indifferent universe. “Blow, winds, and crack your cheeks! Rage! Blow!” commands a storm that cannot possibly obey, dramatizing a man whose royal power is wholly gone. The blank verse strains and breaks under the force of his fury.
- He claims the role of victim. “I am a man / More sinned against than sinning” is Lear’s self-assessment — partly true, partly a refusal to see his own part in his ruin. The thematic stake is self-knowledge arriving too late, or not at all.
- Powerlessness produces an empty vow. “I will do such things — / What they are yet, I know not; but they shall be / The terrors of the earth” shows rage that has completely outrun any capacity to act. The unfinished threat is the measure of his helplessness.
- Two responses to age. The sonnet meets mortality with rhythmic acceptance and faith in art; Lear meets it with thunderous protest against the heavens — composure set beside defiance before the very same end.
Reading
- Sonnet 60 — “Like as the waves make towards the pebbled shore” · Poetry Foundation · Folger Digital Texts
- King Lear, “Blow, winds, and crack your cheeks” — King Lear 3.2 · MIT Shakespeare · Folger Digital Texts
Critical Reception
- Shakespeare’s Sonnets — Royal Shakespeare Company — free RSC overview reading Sonnet 60 as a meditation in which time “destroys everything that it once made beautiful,” answered only by verse.
- King Lear — About the Play — Royal Shakespeare Company — free RSC synopsis and context for the aging king’s descent into the storm.
- King Lear — Folger Shakespeare Library — free scholarly edition with synopsis and context for the heath scene.
In-Class Practice
Read Sonnet 60 twice. Read the Lear speech with a full voice, then read it again more quietly. For five minutes, discuss how the meaning shifts between the loud and quiet readings.
Discussion Questions
- Sonnet 60 watches time the way you watch a wave — unstoppable, rhythmic, inevitable. Does the regularity of that image comfort you or terrify you?
- Lear stands on a heath in a thunderstorm, commanding the wind. He has no power left. What is he doing — grieving, raging, or something else?
- “More sinned against than sinning.” Is Lear right? Or is he refusing to see his own role in what has happened to him?
- Both speakers are old and acutely aware of it. What is different about how each one responds to that awareness?
- Shakespeare returns constantly to old age — in sonnets, in plays, in speeches. Why do you think that is?
- Is there dignity in Lear’s rage, or only in the sonnet’s acceptance — or in both?
Homework
Write about a moment when you felt powerless against something large and indifferent — weather, time, an institution, a loss. What did you want to say to it?
Session 10 — Ambition
Main Points of the Lesson
- Sonnet 94 praises restraint as power. Those “that have power to hurt and will do none, / That do not do the thing they most do show” are admired for withholding force. The RSC calls its closing couplet “the best final couplet of all the sonnets” — a miniature essay on self-mastery as the highest strength.
- The admired are owners; others are servants. “They are the lords and owners of their faces, / Others but stewards of their excellence” draws a hard line between the self-governing and the dependent. Yet the poem’s argument is famously slippery, and the session probes whether this control is virtue or coldness.
- Lady Macbeth asks to be emptied of feeling. “Come, you spirits / That tend on mortal thoughts, unsex me here” is a blank-verse invocation — a plea to have her compassion stripped away so it cannot stay her hand.
- She seeks to seal off conscience itself. “Stop up the access and passage to remorse” makes explicit her wish to sever action from any restraining emotion. The thematic stake is the cost of deliberately unmaking one’s own humanity for the sake of ambition.
- Deception is dressed as innocence. “Look like the innocent flower, / But be the serpent under’t” instructs the splitting of appearance from intent — the very art Macbeth will need to murder a king and survive.
- Restraint can rot. The sonnet’s warning — “Lilies that fester smell far worse than weeds” — suggests withheld power, or virtue gone bad, becomes the most dangerous thing of all, a dark rhyme with Lady Macbeth’s deliberate corruption of her own nature.
Reading
- Sonnet 94 — “They that have power to hurt and will do none” · Poetry Foundation · Folger Digital Texts
- Lady Macbeth, “The raven himself is hoarse” / “Come, you spirits” — Macbeth 1.5 · MIT Shakespeare · Folger Digital Texts
Critical Reception
- Shakespeare’s Sonnets — Royal Shakespeare Company — free RSC overview calling Sonnet 94 “a meditation in the third person, an essay in miniature” on the obligations that come with power.
- Macbeth — About the Play — Royal Shakespeare Company — free RSC overview of the play’s study of ambition and its corrosive consequences.
- Macbeth — Folger Shakespeare Library — free scholarly edition with synopsis and context for Lady Macbeth’s invocation.
In-Class Practice
Read Sonnet 94 slowly, pausing after each quatrain. Read Lady Macbeth’s speech from “The raven himself is hoarse” through “serpent under’t” with a single reader. For five minutes, have the group paraphrase the sonnet’s couplet aloud and debate what it warns against.
Discussion Questions
- Sonnet 94 praises people who have power but don’t use it — who are “lords of their own faces.” Is this admirable self-control or a kind of coldness?
- Lady Macbeth asks to be “unsexed” — to have her compassion removed. What does she believe compassion will prevent her from doing?
- Both texts describe the decision to separate feeling from action. What is gained? What is lost?
- Lady Macbeth is often called the most ambitious character in Shakespeare. Is her ambition for herself, for her husband, or for something else?
- The sonnet ends: “Lilies that fester smell far worse than weeds.” What does that mean — and what does it suggest about the risk of unchecked power?
- Is restraint always a virtue? When does withholding power become its own kind of harm?
Homework
Write two sentences about a time you suppressed a feeling because you thought it would get in the way of something you needed to do.
Session 11 — The Power of Imagination
Main Points of the Lesson
- Sonnet 27 shows a mind that won’t rest. “Weary with toil, I haste me to my bed,” the body lies down exhausted but the thoughts “intend a zealous pilgrimage to thee.” As the RSC paraphrases, “I cannot sleep… because my mind sees you in the darkness.”
- Imagination travels where the body cannot. Even in total dark the speaker “sees” the beloved, suggesting thought has its own restless mobility, indifferent to fatigue or distance. The sonnet’s quiet stake is whether this involuntary inner travel is a gift or an affliction.
- Theseus links lover, lunatic, and poet. His blank-verse speech declares all three “of imagination all compact” — people who perceive what is not literally there. The rhetorical move is provocative grouping: the madman and the artist set side by side.
- The poet transmutes nothing into something. “Gives to airy nothing / A local habitation and a name” is one of Shakespeare’s most famous descriptions of what writing actually does — fixing the formless into shape and word. It reads almost as a definition of his own craft.
- The speech may be self-portrait or boast. Theseus is openly skeptical of imagination, yet his account of the “poet’s eye, in a fine frenzy rolling” is so vivid it can be read as Shakespeare characterizing — and quietly celebrating — his own gift.
- Both texts show the mind outrunning its situation. Whether that movement is escape from circumstance or a deeper form of attention to what matters is the open question the session holds, joining a tired lover and a king’s musing on art.
Reading
- Sonnet 27 — “Weary with toil, I haste me to my bed” · Poetry Foundation · Folger Digital Texts
- Theseus, “The lunatic, the lover, and the poet” — A Midsummer Night’s Dream 5.1 · MIT Shakespeare · Folger Digital Texts
Critical Reception
- Shakespeare’s Sonnets — Royal Shakespeare Company — free RSC overview paraphrasing Sonnet 27 and grouping it with the sonnets of absence and longing.
- A Midsummer Night’s Dream — Folger Shakespeare Library — free scholarly edition with synopsis and context for Theseus’s Act 5 speech on imagination.
- William Shakespeare: Selections — Poetry Foundation — free article on Shakespeare’s poetic imagination across the sonnets and poems.
In-Class Practice
Read Sonnet 27 together, line by line. Read Theseus’s speech from “The lunatic” through “a local habitation,” with two readers alternating at the quatrains. For five minutes, have the group try to define, aloud, what imagination actually does in daily life.
Discussion Questions
- In Sonnet 27, the body is exhausted but the mind won’t rest — it travels to the beloved even during sleep. Is that experience of involuntary thought a blessing or a burden?
- Theseus groups lunatics, lovers, and poets together as people who believe in things that don’t exist. Is he mocking them, or identifying something real about imagination?
- “Gives to airy nothing a local habitation and a name” — Shakespeare describes what writers do. Does this feel like a self-portrait? A boast?
- What do you think imagination actually does — not metaphorically, but in your daily life?
- Both texts show a mind moving beyond its immediate circumstances. Is that escape, or is it a kind of attention?
- Is there a difference between the lover’s imagination and the poet’s — or are they the same faculty pointed at different objects?
Homework
Write about something you have imagined so vividly it felt real — a place, a person, a future. What made it feel that way?
Session 12 — Mercy & Justice
Main Points of the Lesson
- Sonnet 121 defends the inner self against gossip. “‘Tis better to be vile than vile esteemed, / When not to be receives reproach of being” argues that being wrongly judged is worse than the fault itself. The sonnet’s knotty syntax enacts the speaker’s defensive crouch.
- The speaker claims unshakeable self-knowledge. “I am that I am, and they that level / At my abuses reckon up their own” asserts an identity independent of others’ opinions — a creed that can read as healthy confidence or as defensiveness. The stake is whether the self is the most reliable judge of itself.
- Portia argues mercy is divine, not legal. “The quality of mercy is not strained; / It droppeth as the gentle rain from heaven” insists mercy cannot be compelled — only freely given. This blank-verse speech, delivered in a courtroom, sets compassion above the letter of the law.
- Mercy benefits giver and receiver alike. “It is twice blest: / It blesseth him that gives and him that takes” reframes forgiveness as mutual rather than one-directional. The rhetorical move is to show mercy as enriching, not diminishing, the one who grants it.
- Mercy is enthroned above earthly power. “Earthly power doth then show likest God’s / When mercy seasons justice” places compassion higher than the crown and the statute book — the speech’s central claim and its boldest.
- Both texts weigh reputation against truth. The sonnet defends private self-knowledge against slander; the speech argues that how we treat others, not how we are judged, reveals what we are. Read together, they ask whether inner truth or outer reputation matters more.
Reading
- Sonnet 121 — “‘Tis better to be vile than vile esteemed” · Poetry Foundation · Folger Digital Texts
- Portia, “The quality of mercy” — The Merchant of Venice 4.1 · MIT Shakespeare · Folger Digital Texts
Critical Reception
- The Merchant of Venice, Act 4 Scene 1 — Folger Shakespeare Library — the full, freely readable trial scene with Portia’s mercy speech in its dramatic context.
- The Merchant of Venice (Learning) — Royal Shakespeare Company — free RSC resource framing the play as a way to explore justice, law, prejudice, and revenge.
- About Shakespeare’s Sonnets — Folger Shakespeare Library — editors’ free essay useful for reading Sonnet 121’s defense of the self.
In-Class Practice
Read Sonnet 121 by one reader, followed by discussion before the speech. Read the “quality of mercy” speech as a full group, one sentence at a time. For five minutes, have the group debate aloud whether mercy can ever be owed, or only given.
Discussion Questions
- Sonnet 121 essentially says: I know who I am, whatever others say about me. Is that confidence healthy self-knowledge, or defensiveness?
- Portia argues that mercy is a divine quality — above power, above the law. Do you agree? Is there ever a situation where strict justice is better than mercy?
- “It is twice blest: it blesseth him that gives and him that takes.” What does Portia mean? Have you ever felt that giving mercy did something for you as well as the person you forgave?
- Both texts are about how we are seen versus how we know ourselves to be. Which matters more — inner truth or outer reputation?
- Portia is disguised as a man when she delivers this speech. Does knowing that add a layer of meaning?
- Can mercy ever be unjust? Where is the line between compassion and the failure to hold someone accountable?
Homework
Write about a time when you chose mercy over justice — or justice over mercy. What did you weigh?
Session 13 — Memory & Loss
Main Points of the Lesson
- Sonnet 71 asks to be forgotten. “No longer mourn for me when I am dead / Than you shall hear the surly sullen bell” frames a request to be released from grief quickly — what the RSC calls “a plea for oblivion.”
- The plea may be love or hidden martyrdom. “I… would be forgot, / If thinking on me then should make you sad” can read as pure selflessness — or as a guilt-laden bid that produces more grief by asking for none. The session weighs which reading the poem invites.
- Constance makes grief a physical presence. “Grief fills the room up of my absent child, / Lies in his bed, walks up and down with me” turns sorrow into an occupant of space — a body where a body is missing. This blank-verse speech gives mourning an almost tangible weight.
- She refuses to be consoled. “Then have I reason to be fond of grief” insists that mourning is the last way of keeping the lost child near, not a wound to be hurried closed. The thematic stake is grief defended as fidelity.
- Madness is imagined as mercy. “I am not mad; I would to heaven I were! / For then ‘tis like I should forget myself” reveals Constance envying the forgetting that madness would bring — a measure of how unbearable lucid grief has become.
- Both texts confront what we owe the dead. One speaker would spare the living from grief; the other insists grief is the truest bond with the lost — opposite ethics of mourning, set side by side for the room to weigh.
Reading
- Sonnet 71 — “No longer mourn for me when I am dead” · Poetry Foundation · Folger Digital Texts
- Constance, “Grief fills the room up of my absent child” — King John 3.4 · MIT Shakespeare · Folger Digital Texts
Critical Reception
- Shakespeare’s Sonnets — Royal Shakespeare Company — free RSC overview describing Sonnet 71 as a request that “your mourning for me be short” and “a plea for oblivion.”
- King John — Folger Shakespeare Library — free scholarly edition with synopsis and context for Constance’s grief speech.
- William Shakespeare (poet overview) — Poetry Foundation — free biography framing Shakespeare’s recurring treatment of grief and loss.
In-Class Practice
Read Sonnet 71 by one reader. Read Constance’s speech passed sentence by sentence, so the group shares the weight of it. For five minutes, discuss aloud which speaker’s relationship to grief feels truer to you, and why.
Discussion Questions
- The speaker of Sonnet 71 asks to be forgotten quickly after death — because being mourned would reflect badly on the mourner. Is this genuine selflessness, or something else?
- Constance describes her grief as a presence — something that fills the room, lies in the bed. Have you ever experienced grief that way, as a physical occupant of your space?
- “I am not mad; I would to heaven I were! For then ‘tis like I should forget myself.” Why would Constance want to forget herself? What would that solve?
- Both texts ask: what do we owe the dead? What do we owe ourselves in grief?
- Society often tells people how long and in what way they should grieve. What do these texts say about that?
- Is there a kind of love in refusing to stop grieving — or does grief eventually become its own burden?
Homework
Write a few lines about a loss that stayed with you longer than you expected — or that surprised you by going quickly.
Session 14 — Self-Knowledge
Main Points of the Lesson
- Sonnet 62 opens in unembarrassed vanity. “Sin of self-love possesseth all mine eye / And all my soul and all my every part” is a confession of total self-absorption, the speaker convinced no face or worth surpasses his own.
- Self-love dissolves into love of another. The turn reveals that the “self” the speaker has been praising is really the beloved — “‘tis thee, myself, that for myself I praise, / Painting my age with beauty of thy days.” The rhetorical surprise collapses the boundary between self and other.
- Hamlet exalts humankind, then deflates it. “What a piece of work is a man! How noble in reason, how infinite in faculty!” rises in this prose speech toward genuine wonder — “in apprehension how like a god!” — before crashing.
- “Quintessence of dust” reverses the praise. The sublime catalogue ends in disgust — “and yet, to me, what is this quintessence of dust?” — exposing the depression beneath the rhetoric of admiration. The stake is how completely mood can invert the very same facts.
- Tone is unstable and context-dependent. Whether the speech is sincere, ironic, or both depends on whom Hamlet addresses (the spies Rosencrantz and Guildenstern) and what he suspects of them — a reminder that meaning lives in dramatic situation.
- Both texts test the limits of self-perception. Each circles the question of how clearly any of us can actually see ourselves — through vanity, through despair, through love — making the session a study in the unreliability of the inward gaze.
Reading
- Sonnet 62 — “Sin of self-love possesseth all mine eye” · Poetry Foundation · Folger Digital Texts
- Hamlet, “What a piece of work is a man” — Hamlet 2.2 · MIT Shakespeare · Folger Digital Texts
Critical Reception
- Hamlet — About the Play — Royal Shakespeare Company — free RSC overview of how the play takes the audience “deep into the mind” of its protagonist through speeches like this one.
- Hamlet — Folger Shakespeare Library — free scholarly edition with synopsis and context for the “piece of work” speech.
- About Shakespeare’s Sonnets — Folger Shakespeare Library — editors’ free essay useful for reading Sonnet 62’s play on self and other.
In-Class Practice
Read Sonnet 62 by one reader. Read the Hamlet speech, pausing after “how like a god” — hold the pause — then finish. For five minutes, discuss aloud how the held pause changes the meaning of “quintessence of dust.”
Discussion Questions
- Sonnet 62 begins as self-love and ends as love for another person — the two collapse into each other. Is that a resolution or a confusion?
- Hamlet’s speech sounds like praise of humanity — and then completely inverts itself. What does “quintessence of dust” tell us about where Hamlet actually is, emotionally?
- “What a piece of work is a man!” — is this ironic, sincere, or both? How does the context of who Hamlet is speaking to (and what he knows) shape the speech?
- Both texts circle around self-perception. How well can any of us actually see ourselves?
- Has your view of your own worth changed across your life? What changed it?
- Is it possible to love yourself rightly — or does self-love always distort the view, as Sonnet 62 suggests?
Homework
Complete this sentence in as many ways as you can: “What a piece of work is a ___.” Then pick the one that feels most true and write three sentences about it.
Session 15 — Letting Go
Main Points of the Lesson
- Sonnet 87 frames loss as logic. “Farewell, thou art too dear for my possessing” treats the beloved as a treasure that was never truly the speaker’s to keep, so the parting is presented as only reasonable. As the RSC puts it, the poet “relinquishes his claim on the young man.”
- A legal metaphor distances the pain. “The cause of this fair gift in me is wanting, / And so my patent back again is swerving” recasts heartbreak as the lawful return of something merely lent. The rhetorical move is composure laid carefully over grief.
- The dream image admits the ache. “Thus have I had thee as a dream doth flatter — / In sleep a king, but waking no such matter” reveals that the rationalized loss still wakes the speaker to emptiness. The cool argument cannot fully cover the wound.
- Prospero dissolves the world into air. “These our actors… / Are melted into air, into thin air” — this blank-verse speech shows the theatrical illusion, and perhaps the world itself, to be insubstantial, a pageant that fades.
- Life is bracketed by sleep. “We are such stuff / As dreams are made on, and our little life / Is rounded with a sleep” offers a serene, almost consoling view of impermanence, often heard as Shakespeare’s own valediction to his art.
- Both texts release with composure. Each describes an ending with unusual calm, leaving open the session’s question: whether that calm is genuine equanimity or grief wearing a composed face.
Reading
- Sonnet 87 — “Farewell, thou art too dear for my possessing” · Poetry Foundation · Folger Digital Texts
- Prospero, “Our revels now are ended” — The Tempest 4.1 · MIT Shakespeare · Folger Digital Texts
Critical Reception
- Shakespeare’s Sonnets — Royal Shakespeare Company — free RSC overview describing Sonnet 87 as the moment the poet “relinquishes his claim on the young man.”
- The Tempest — About the Play — Royal Shakespeare Company — free RSC overview of Shakespeare’s “final play, a meditation on art, power and freedom,” and Prospero’s renunciation of his magic.
- The Tempest — Folger Shakespeare Library — free scholarly edition with synopsis and context for the “revels” speech.
In-Class Practice
Read Sonnet 87 by one reader, slowly. Read Prospero’s speech by one reader, then read it again, together, in unison. For five minutes, discuss aloud whether the calm in each text feels like peace or like grief held in check.
Discussion Questions
- The speaker of Sonnet 87 says he never really deserved what he had — so the loss is logical. Does framing loss as logical make it hurt less?
- “In sleep a king, but waking no such matter” — is the speaker consoling himself, or devastated? Both?
- Prospero’s speech is often read as Shakespeare’s farewell to his career. Does knowing that make it feel different? Should context change how we read a text?
- “We are such stuff as dreams are made on.” What is Prospero saying about reality? About art? About himself?
- Both texts describe endings with unusual calm. Is that equanimity, or is it grief wearing a composed face?
- Looking back across the fifteen sessions of this course: what are you letting go of that you came in with — a resistance, a fear, a preconception about Shakespeare?
Homework
Write about something you have let go of — willingly or not — that turned out to be the right thing to release.
Session 16 — Capstone: Favorite Passages
Main Points of the Lesson
- Reading returns the words to the room. The course closes by handing the texts back to the people who read them, affirming a principle held since Session 1: that meaning lives in the act of voicing, not only in analysis. Shakespeare’s lines, written for the ear, reach full life only when spoken in company.
- A favorite passage is itself an interpretation. Choosing one sonnet or speech to read aloud is a small act of criticism — it declares what mattered most across sixteen weeks, and why. The selection becomes the participant’s own quiet argument.
- Sonnet 18 frames the whole course. Returning together to “Shall I compare thee to a summer’s day?” closes the loop opened in Session 1 and puts its central wager to the test: whether a poem can, in fact, outlast time and keep something alive.
- Recognition, not mastery, is the goal. The capstone asks not what you learned to define, but what you recognized — in the language, and in your own life — honoring the course’s promise that no credentials were ever required, only attention.
- Reading aloud completes the sonnet’s and speech’s form. Both verse and blank verse were built for the speaking voice; the final group reading of Sonnet 18, line by line around the room, enacts the very claim the poem makes about endurance.
- The reflection measures change. Comparing your Session 1 sentence — “When I read Shakespeare, I feel…” — to how you feel now makes the course’s effect visible in your own words, the truest assessment in an ungraded class.
Reading
- Your choice — any sonnet or speech from across the course · Poetry Foundation · Folger Digital Texts
- Closing together: Sonnet 18 — “Shall I compare thee to a summer’s day?” · Poetry Foundation · Folger Digital Texts
Critical Reception
- About Shakespeare’s Sonnets — Folger Shakespeare Library — free editors’ essay for revisiting any sonnet chosen for the capstone.
- Shakespeare’s Sonnets — Royal Shakespeare Company — free RSC overview with paraphrases of many of the course’s sonnets, useful for a final close read.
- William Shakespeare (poet overview) — Poetry Foundation — free biography that places the full body of work in perspective.
In-Class Practice
Each participant is invited — not required — to read a sonnet or speech from anywhere in the course aloud to the group: two to three minutes, no commentary needed unless you want to offer it. Then the whole group reads Sonnet 18 together, one line at a time around the room.
Discussion Questions
- Which text from the course will you remember after today? What made it stay?
- Did anything we read change how you think about something in your own life — a relationship, a loss, an ambition, a fear?
- What surprised you most about Shakespeare — about the language, the subjects, the experience of reading aloud?
- What would you tell a neighbor who is nervous about coming to a Shakespeare reading group?
- What would you want to read next?
- If you wrote the sentence that began “When I read Shakespeare, I feel…” in Session 1 — read it again. Would you write it differently now?
Homework
Take one sonnet or speech you loved and read it aloud to someone outside the course this week. Notice what they hear in it that you didn’t — and bring that, in spirit, into your next reading. Instructor’s closing remarks to be offered by James Mulhern.
All the Readings▾
All texts are free and in the public domain. No purchase is required.
The Sonnets
| Sonnet | Poetry Foundation | Folger Digital Texts |
|---|---|---|
| Complete Sonnets | poetryfoundation.org/poems/detail/45087 | folger.edu — Sonnets |
| Sonnet 18 | Poetry Foundation | Folger |
| Sonnet 27 | Poetry Foundation | Folger |
| Sonnet 29 | Poetry Foundation | Folger |
| Sonnet 30 | Poetry Foundation | Folger |
| Sonnet 57 | Poetry Foundation | Folger |
| Sonnet 60 | Poetry Foundation | Folger |
| Sonnet 62 | Poetry Foundation | Folger |
| Sonnet 71 | Poetry Foundation | Folger |
| Sonnet 73 | Poetry Foundation | Folger |
| Sonnet 87 | Poetry Foundation | Folger |
| Sonnet 94 | Poetry Foundation | Folger |
| Sonnet 116 | Poetry Foundation | Folger |
| Sonnet 121 | Poetry Foundation | Folger |
| Sonnet 130 | Poetry Foundation | Folger |
| Sonnet 147 | Poetry Foundation | Folger |
The Plays (Speeches and Soliloquies)
| Play | MIT Shakespeare | Folger Digital Texts |
|---|---|---|
| As You Like It | MIT | Folger |
| Romeo and Juliet | MIT | Folger |
| Macbeth | MIT | Folger |
| Antony and Cleopatra | MIT | Folger |
| Hamlet | MIT | Folger |
| Othello | MIT | Folger |
| Henry V | MIT | Folger |
| King Lear | MIT | Folger |
| A Midsummer Night’s Dream | MIT | Folger |
| The Merchant of Venice | MIT | Folger |
| King John | MIT | Folger |
| The Tempest | MIT | Folger |